Categories
JavaScript TypeScript

Introduction to TypeScript Interfaces — Enforcing Class Implementation

The big advantage of TypeScript over plain JavaScript is that it extends the features of JavaScript by adding type safety to our program’s objects. It does this by checking the shape of the values that an object takes on. Checking the shape is called duck typing or structural typing.

Interfaces are one way to fill the role of naming data types in TypeScript. It’s very useful for defining a contract within our code in TypeScript programs. In this article, we will look at how we use interfaces for enforcing the implementation of classes.

Class Types

We can use TypeScript interfaces to make sure classes meet a specific contract as specified by interfaces like in other programming languages such as C# and Java. For example, we can define a class that implements the items specified by the interface with the implements keyword like we do in the code below:

interface PersonInterface {  
  name: string;  
}

class Person implements PersonInterface {  
  name: string = 'Mary';      
}

In the code above, we implemented the class Person which implements the items outlined in the PersonInterface. Since the PersonInterface has the field name which is a string, we follow that contract in the Person class that we implemented below that. The code above implements all the items outlined in the interface, so the TypeScript compiler will accept the code above as being valid. If we didn’t implement the items in the interface but we used the implements keyword, then we’ll get an error:

interface PersonInterface {  
  name: string;    
  age: number;    
}

class Person implements PersonInterface {      
  name: string = 'Mary';    
  foo: any = 'abc';  
}

For example, if we have the code above, then the TypeScript compiler will reject it with an error since we only have the name field in the Person, but instead of the age field, we have foo instead. So if we try to compile the code above, we would get an error message “Class ‘Person’ incorrectly implements interface ‘PersonInterface’. Property ‘age’ is missing in type ‘Person’ but required in type ‘PersonInterface’.”

However, after we implemented all the items in the interface, we can add extra items that aren’t specified in the interface and the TypeScript compiler would accept the code:

interface PersonInterface {  
  name: string;      
}

class Person implements PersonInterface {      
  name: string = 'Mary';    
  age: number = 20;  
}

The code above would be accepted by the TypeScript compiler since we have all the things in the interface and we added stuff to the class which isn’t in the interface, which is acceptable in TypeScript.

We can also describe methods that we will implement in classes with an interface. To do this, we can add method signatures along with their return type in our interfaces, like in the code below:

interface PersonInterface {  
  name: string;  
  age: number;  
  setName(name: string): string;  
  setAge(age: number): number;  
}

class Person implements PersonInterface {      
  name: string = 'Mary';    
  age: number = 20;  
  setName(name: string) {  
    this.name = name;  
    return name;  
  } 

  setAge(age: number) {  
    this.age = age;  
    return age;  
  }  
}

In the code above, we put 2 method signatures that are to be implemented in the class that implements the interface in the PersonInterface. We have the method signature for the setName method and another one for the setAge method. Inside the parentheses of each we specified the required parameters for each method. In the setName method, we specified that we require the name parameter and is of the type string. In the setAge method, we specified that we have an age parameter and is of type number. That’s the part on the left of the colon. On the right of the colon, we have the return type of each method. For the setName method, we specified that it returns a string. In the signature of the setAge method, we specified that it returns a number.

Then in the Person class, we just following the implementation as it’s outlined in the interface. So we added the name and age fields, which we designate as type string and number respectively. Then we add the setName and setAge methods as we outlined in the PersonInterface. Note that the type designation in the parameters of the methods are required, but the return type is not since it can be inferred by TypeScript but the parameter types have to checked explicitly. This means that if we have something like the following code with the parameter type omitted:

interface PersonInterface {  
  name: string;  
  age: number;  
  setName(name: string): string;  
  setAge(age: number): number;  
}

class Person implements PersonInterface {      
  name: string = 'Mary';    
  age: number = 20;  
  setName(name) {  
    this.name = name;  
    return name;  
  } 

  setAge(age) {  
    this.age = age;  
    return age;  
  }  
}

Then the TypeScript compiler will reject the code with the error messages “Parameter ‘name’ implicitly has an ‘any’ type.(7006)” for the setName method and “Parameter ‘age’ implicitly has an ‘any’ type.(7006)”. As we can see from the errors, parameters that have no type designation attached to it will be implicitly designated the any type, which isn’t what’s specified in the PersonInterface .

Interfaces only describe the public side of classes, rather than both the public and private side. This means that we can’t use it for checking private fields and methods.

Static Side vs Instance Side of Classes

In TypeScript, interfaces only check the instance side of classes, so anything that’s related to the static side of classes isn’t checked. For example, if we have the following code:

interface PersonInterface {  
  new (name: string, age: number);  
}

class Person implements PersonInterface {      
  constructor(name: string, age: number) {}  
}

We would get the error “Class ‘Person’ incorrectly implements interface ‘PersonInterface’. Type ‘Person’ provides no match for the signature ‘new (name: string, age: number)” since the static side of a class can’t be checked by an interface, and the constructor is on the static side. Instead we have to add different interfaces for each part of the static side. We can do this like in the code below:

interface PersonConstructor {  
  new (name: string, age: number): PersonInterface;  
}

interface PersonInterface {  
  name: string;  
  age: number;  
  greet(name: string): void;  
}

const createPerson = (ctor: PersonConstructor, name: string, age: number): PersonInterface =>{  
  return new ctor(name, age);      
}

class Person implements PersonInterface {      
  name: string;  
  age: number;  
  constructor(name: string, age: number) {  
    this.name = name;  
    this.age = age;  
  }  
  greet(name: string) {  
    console.log(`Hello ${this.name}. You're ${this.age} years old.`)  
  }  
}

let person = createPerson(Person, 'Jane', 20);  
console.log(person);

With the code above, the PersonInterface only has the public members, which are name , age , and the greet method. This forces us to implement these members in our Person class. The constructor isn’t checked by the PersonInterface since it’s a static member. We leave the check for that in the createPerson function. In createPerson, we check that the ctor parameter implements the PersonConstructor correctly, since we have the new method with the name and age parameters in the signature and we checked that it returns a PersonInterface which means that the constructor is returning an instance of some class that implements the PersonInterface . The code above will be accepted by the TypeScript compiler since we checked the static side separately from the instance side since we created the createPerson to let us check the static side, which is the constructor .

Another powerful feature of TypeScript is that we can use interfaces to check what we implemented in our classes by using interfaces. It’s useful for checking non-static members of a class. However, for static members like constructor , we have to check them outside the interface that we use for implementing classes since they can’t check for static members like the constructor method.

Categories
JavaScript React

Creating 404 and Recursive Paths with React Router

React is a library for creating front end views. It has a big ecosystem of libraries that work with it. Also, we can use it to enhance existing apps.

To build single-page apps, we have to have some way to map URLs to the React component to display.

In this article, we’ll look at how to create 404 routes and recursive paths with React Router.

404 Routes

We can create 404 routes to show something when none of the routes we added are matched.

To do this, we can use the asterisk as a wildcard character.

For example, we can write the following code;

import React from "react";  
import ReactDOM from "react-dom";  
import { BrowserRouter as Router, Switch, Route, Link } from "react-router-dom";

function Foo() {  
  return <h3>Foo</h3>;  
}

function Bar() {  
  return <h3>Bar</h3>;  
}

function NotFound() {  
  return <h3>Not Found</h3>;  
}

function App() {  
  return (  
    <Router>  
      <div>  
        <ul>  
          <li>  
            <Link to="/">Foo</Link>  
          </li>  
          <li>  
            <Link to="/bar">Bar</Link>  
          </li>  
          <li>  
            <Link to="/doesnt-exist">Doesn't Exist</Link>  
          </li>  
        </ul> <Switch>  
          <Route exact path="/">  
            <Foo />  
          </Route>  
          <Route path="/bar">  
            <Bar />  
          </Route>  
          <Route path="*">  
            <NotFound />  
          </Route>  
        </Switch>  
      </div>  
    </Router>  
  );  
}

const rootElement = document.getElementById("root");  
ReactDOM.render(<App />, rootElement);

In the code above, we have the Switch component that has the following Route:

<Route path="\*">  
    <NotFound />  
</Route>

It’ll match any URL that doesn’t match the other routes.

Therefore, when we click the Doesn’t Exist link, we’ll see Not Found.

This also applies when we type in anything other / or /bar as the relative path.

The * is the wildcard character for matching anything.

Recursive Routes

Just like any other routes, we can define routes recursively. The only difference is that we reference the component within the Route with itself.

For example, if we have an array of NEIGHBORS as follows:

const NEIGHBORS = [  
  { id: 0, name: "Jane", neighbors: [1, 2, 3] },  
  { id: 1, name: "Joe", neighbors: [0, 3] },  
  { id: 2, name: "Mary", neighbors: [0, 1, 3] },  
  { id: 3, name: "David", neighbors: [1, 2] }  
];

where the neighbors array references the id of the other entries.

Then we can define a Neighbor component and use it as follows:

import React from "react";  
import ReactDOM from "react-dom";  
import { BrowserRouter as Router, Switch, Route, Link } from "react-router-dom";  
import { useParams, useRouteMatch, Redirect } from "react-router";

const NEIGHBORS = [  
  { id: 0, name: "Jane", neighbors: [1, 2, 3] },  
  { id: 1, name: "Joe", neighbors: [0, 3] },  
  { id: 2, name: "Mary", neighbors: [0, 1, 3] },  
  { id: 3, name: "David", neighbors: [1, 2] }  
];

const find = id => {  
  return NEIGHBORS.find(p => p.id === id);  
};

function Neighbor() {  
  const { url } = useRouteMatch();  
  const { id } = useParams();  
  const neighbor = find(+id); return (  
    <div>  
      <h3>{neighbor.name}’s neighbors</h3> <ul>  
        {neighbor.neighbors.map(id => (  
          <li key={id}>  
            <Link to={`${url}/${id}`}>{find(id).name}</Link>  
          </li>  
        ))}  
      </ul> 
      <Switch>  
        <Route path={`${url}/:id`}>  
          <Neighbor />  
        </Route>  
      </Switch>  
    </div>  
  );  
}

function App() {  
  return (  
    <Router>  
      <Switch>  
        <Route path="/:id">  
          <Neighbor />  
        </Route>  
        <Route path="/">  
          <Redirect to="/0" />  
        </Route>  
      </Switch>  
    </Router>  
  );  
}

const rootElement = document.getElementById("root");  
ReactDOM.render(<App />, rootElement);

In the code above, we have the find function to make find neighbors easy.

Then in the Neighbor component, we have:

const { id } = useParams();  
const neighbor = find(+id);

to get the id from the URL, and then find the neighbor with it using the find function.

Then we display the neighbors of the neighbor by writing:

<ul>  
    {neighbor.neighbors.map(id => (  
    <li key={id}>  
        <Link to={`${url}/${id}`}>{find(id).name}</Link>  
    </li>  
    ))}  
</ul>

Then we have a Switch component that has Neighbor again in the Route :

<Switch>  
    <Route path={`${url}/:id`}>  
        <Neighbor />  
    </Route>  
</Switch>

This is the part that’s recursive, since Neighbor references itself here. We set the path to `${url}/:id` so that when the Link s above is clicked, we’ll see the new neighbors.

Then in App , we just have the usual routes. Once again, we have path=”/:id” to find a neighbor by id .

Conclusion

We can define 404 routes easily by setting the path ‘ value of the Route to an asterisk.

To define recursive routes, we can reference routes within itself. It’s treated no differently than any other kind of route.

Categories
JavaScript React

Lazy Load Your React Code With Code-Splitting

React is a library for creating front-end views. It has a big ecosystem of libraries that work with it. Also, we can use it to enhance existing apps.

In this article, we’ll look at how to make apps load faster by splitting code so that only the parts that are needed will load.


Code-Splitting

We need code-splitting so that product React bundles won’t be too big. As our apps get bigger, the production bundles will also get bigger and take longer to load if we don’t split them and load them only when needed.

Create React App has code-splitting support built-in. We can use the lazy and import functions from React to achieve this.

For example, we can use those functions as follows:

Foo.js:

import React from "react";export default function Foo() {  
  return <div>foo</div>;  
}

App.js:

In the code above, we have Foo.js with the Foo component.

Then, in App.js, we have the App component that has Suspense to load the fallback. UI has the Foo import loads. We need this since Foo is loaded at runtime.

React.lazy loads the Foo component at runtime instead of at build time. It also splits the code from the bundle into a separate file so that each bundled file is smaller.

We’ll get an error telling us to add a fallback UI with the Suspense component if it’s missing.

The fallback prop accepts any React element that we want to render while waiting for the component to load. We can place Suspense anywhere above the lazy component.

Wrapping multiple elements in a single Suspense element also works.


Error Boundaries

To fail gracefully when other modules fail to load, such as where network failure occurs, we can use error boundary components.

To use them, we wrap them around the Suspense component as follows:

ErrorBoundary.js:

Foo.js:

import React from "react";

export default function Foo() {  
  return <div>foo</div>;  
}

App.js:

In the code above, we added the ErrorBoundary component in ErrorBoundary.js.

Then, in App, we wrapped it around our Suspense component, which lets us catch any errors that occur when loading the Foo component.


Route-Based Code-Splitting

Many React apps are single-page apps. They’ll have routes to map URLs to components.

We can split code based on routes. For example, we can incorporate React Router routes into our app and split code based on routes as follows:

Foo.js:

import React from "react";

export default function Foo() {  
  return <div>foo</div>;  
}

Bar.js:

import React from "react";

export default function Bar() {  
  return <div>bar</div>;  
}

App.js:

In the example above, we add the Router component around all our components.

We put the Routes inside the Suspense component so that they can be lazy-loaded. That is, they load only when we load the route in our browser.

This is also why we need the Suspense component around the routes. We need the fallback UI so that it’ll be shown when the routes are loading.


Named Exports

React.lazy only supports default exports. If our module uses named exports, then we have to create an intermediate module that re-exports it as default.

For example, we can arrange our code as follows:

Foo.js:

import React from "react";

export const Foo = function() {  
  return <div>foo</div>;  
};

FooDefault.js:

import { Foo } from "./Foo";

export default Foo;

App.js:

import React, { Suspense } from "react";
const FooComponent = React.lazy(() => import("./Foo"));
export default function App() {
  return (
    <Suspense fallback={<div>Loading...</div>}>
      <FooComponent />
    </Suspense>
  );
}

In the code above, we have FooDefault.js that exports Foo as a default export.

Then, we imported it in App.js with React.lazy.


Conclusion

Code-splitting is easy with Create React App and React. React has the lazy method to import components on the fly.

We need a fallback UI so that we can see something when the dynamically imported component loads.

Error boundaries are also supported and we can use it to gracefully fail when a dynamically imported component fails to load.

Code-splitting is also supported by React Router. React.lazy is smart enough to split code by route.

Categories
JavaScript React

Creating Sidebars with React Router

React is a library for creating front end views. It has a big ecosystem of libraries that work with it. Also, we can use it to enhance existing apps.

To build single-page apps, we have to have some way to map URLs to the React component to display.

In this article, we’ll look at how to create sidebars with route content only displaying in a portion of the screen with React Router.

Creating Sidebar

We can easily create a fixed sidebar on one side of the screen while displaying route content on the other.

To do this, we just need to add our sidebar on one side with links and the Switch and Route components on the other.

For example, we can write the following code to achieve this effect:

import React from "react";  
import ReactDOM from "react-dom";  
import { BrowserRouter as Router, Switch, Route, Link } from "react-router-dom";

const routes = [  
  {  
    path: "/",  
    exact: true,  
    sidebar: () => <div>home</div>,  
    main: () => <h2>Home</h2>  
  },  
  {  
    path: "/foo",  
    sidebar: () => <div>foo</div>,  
    main: () => <h2>Bubblegum</h2>  
  },  
  {  
    path: "/shoelbaraces",  
    sidebar: () => <div>bar</div>,  
    main: () => <h2>Shoelaces</h2>  
  }  
];

function App() {  
  return (  
    <Router>  
      <div style={{ display: "flex" }}>  
        <div  
          style={{  
            padding: "10px",  
            width: "40%",  
            background: "pink"  
          }}  
        >  
          <ul style={{ listStyleType: "none", padding: 0 }}>  
            <li>  
              <Link to="/">Home</Link>  
            </li>  
            <li>  
              <Link to="/foo">Foo</Link>  
            </li>  
            <li>  
              <Link to="/bar">Bar</Link>  
            </li>  
          </ul> <Switch>  
            {routes.map((route, index) => (  
              <Route  
                key={index}  
                path={route.path}  
                exact={route.exact}  
                children={<route.sidebar />}  
              />  
            ))}  
          </Switch>  
        </div> <div style={{ flex: 1, padding: "10px" }}>  
          <Switch>  
            {routes.map((route, index) => (  
              <Route  
                key={index}  
                path={route.path}  
                exact={route.exact}  
                children={<route.main />}  
              />  
            ))}  
          </Switch>  
        </div>  
      </div>  
    </Router>  
  );  
}

const rootElement = document.getElementById("root");  
ReactDOM.render(<App />, rootElement);

In the code above, we have the sidebar in the top of App . And we have the routes array as follows:

const routes = [  
  {  
    path: "/",  
    exact: true,  
    sidebar: () => <div>home</div>,  
    main: () => <h2>Home</h2>  
  },  
  {  
    path: "/foo",  
    sidebar: () => <div>foo</div>,  
    main: () => <h2>Bubblegum</h2>  
  },  
  {  
    path: "/shoelbaraces",  
    sidebar: () => <div>bar</div>,  
    main: () => <h2>Shoelaces</h2>  
  }  
];

In the outermost div of App , we have display: 'flex' style to display the sidebar and the route content side by side, with the sidebar of the left and the route content on the right.

The sidebar is composed of the following code in App :

<div style={{ padding: "10px", width: "40%", background: "#f0f0f0" }}>  
    <ul style={{ listStyleType: "none", padding: 0 }}>  
        <li>  
            <Link to="/">Home</Link>  
        </li>  
        <li>  
            <Link to="/foo">Foo</Link>  
        </li>  
        <li>  
            <Link to="/bar">Bar</Link>  
        </li>  
    </ul>  
    <Switch>  
        {routes.map((route, index) => (  
        <Route key={index} path={route.path} exact={route.exact} children={<route.sidebar />} /> ))}  
    </Switch>  
</div>

In the code above, we have the ul element to display the Link s, which we can click on the show the route that we want.

In the Switch component, we have the routes array mapped to Route s that we want to display in the sidebar.

We want to display the component we set as the value of the sidebar in each entry of routes . Therefore, we set children to that.

In the routes array, we have the route with path set to '/' has the exact property set to true .

We have to do this so that React Router won’t direct all routes that start with a / to the ‘home’ route. This is because React Router doesn’t look at the other routes once it found a match.

If the match isn’t exact, then it’ll take anything that starts with a / as the correct match. In this case, it’ll be the first route.

The right side is composed of the following code:

<div style={{ flex: 1, padding: "10px" }}>  
    <Switch>  
        {routes.map((route, index) => (  
        <Route key={index} path={route.path} exact={route.exact} children={<route.main />} /> ))}  
    </Switch>  
</div>

The code above maps the routes array again to Route s, but we set the children prop to the components set to the main property instead of sidebar .

Conclusion

We can create a sidebar easily by using flexbox and the Switch and Route components.

As long as we have Switch and Route components in only one portion of the screen, the route content will only be displayed on that part of the screen.

Flexbox lets us display items side by side without hassle.

Categories
JavaScript Vue

Vue Router 4 — Navigation

Vue Router 4 is in beta and it’s subject to change.

To build a single page app easily, we got to add routing so that URLs will be mapped to components that are rendered.

In this article, we’ll look at how to use Vue Router 4 with Vue 3.

Navigation

We can navigate to a route with the this.$router ‘s methods.

For example, we can write:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <script src="https://unpkg.com/vue@next"></script>
    <script src="https://unpkg.com/vue-router@4.0.0-beta.7/dist/vue-router.global.js"></script>
    <title>App</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <div id="app">
      <p>
        <router-link to="/foo">Go to Foo</router-link>
        <router-link to="/bar">Go to Bar</router-link>
        <a @click="goBack" href="#">Go Back</a>
      </p>
      <router-view></router-view>
    </div>
    <script>
      const Foo = { template: "<div>foo</div>" };
      const Bar = { template: "<div>bar</div>" };

      const routes = [
        { path: "/foo", component: Foo },
        { path: "/bar", component: Bar }
      ];

      const router = VueRouter.createRouter({
        history: VueRouter.createWebHistory(),
        routes
      });

      const app = Vue.createApp({
        methods: {
          goBack() {
            window.history.length > 1
              ? this.$router.go(-1)
              : this.$router.push("/foo");
          }
        }
      });
      app.use(router);
      app.mount("#app");
    </script>
  </body>
</html>

to create a goBack method and call it when we click on the Go Back link.

In the method, we check if there are anything in the browser history.

If there is, then we go back to the previous page.

Otherwise, we go to the /foo page.

Reacting to Params Changes

We can react to route params changes in a few ways.

For instance, we can write:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <script src="https://unpkg.com/vue@next"></script>
    <script src="https://unpkg.com/vue-router@4.0.0-beta.7/dist/vue-router.global.js"></script>
    <title>App</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <div id="app">
      <p>
        <router-link to="/foo/1">Foo 1</router-link>
        <router-link to="/foo/2">Foo 2</router-link>
      </p>
      <router-view></router-view>
    </div>
    <script>
      const Foo = {
        template: "<div>foo</div>",
        watch: {
          $route(to, from) {
            console.log(to, from);
          }
        }
      };

      const routes = [{ path: "/foo/:id", component: Foo }];

      const router = VueRouter.createRouter({
        history: VueRouter.createWebHistory(),
        routes
      });

      const app = Vue.createApp({});
      app.use(router);
      app.mount("#app");
    </script>
  </body>
</html>

We have the /foo/:id route that maps to the Foo component.

And in the Foo component, we have the $route watcher to watch the route.

to has the route to go to. from has the route that we departed from.

They’re both objects with the path, route metadata, route parameters, query parameters, and more.

Also, we can use the beforeRouteUpdate method to watch for route changes:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <script src="[https://unpkg.com/vue@next](https://unpkg.com/vue@next)"></script>
    <script src="[https://unpkg.com/vue-router@4.0.0-beta.7/dist/vue-router.global.js](https://unpkg.com/vue-router@4.0.0-beta.7/dist/vue-router.global.js)"></script>
    <title>App</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <div id="app">
      <p>
        <router-link to="/foo/1">Foo 1</router-link>
        <router-link to="/foo/2">Foo 2</router-link>
      </p>
      <router-view></router-view>
    </div>
    <script>
      const Foo = {
        template: "<div>foo</div>",
        beforeRouteUpdate(to, from, next) {
          console.log(to, from);
          next();
        }
      };

      const routes = [{ path: "/foo/:id", component: Foo }];

      const router = VueRouter.createRouter({
        history: VueRouter.createWebHistory(),
        routes
      });

      const app = Vue.createApp({});
      app.use(router);
      app.mount("#app");
    </script>
  </body>
</html>

Instead of watching the $route object, we have the beforeRouteUpdate hook, which is made available with the app.use(router) call.

Now when we click on the links, we’ll see the same data as we did with the watcher.

The only difference is that we call next to move to the next route.

Conclusion

We can watch for navigation with watchers or hooks with Vue Router 4.